Hi Vladimir, On 10 May 2021, at 04:32, Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+i...@nic.cz> wrote:
> On 10. 05. 21 10:19, Petr Špaček wrote: >> I think the proper solution should be a real multi-query option, which >> incidentally provides a superset of RRSERIAL capabilities. > > If multi-queries require the records being in sync (if from the same zone), I > really dislike the implications of them being sent to resolvers, especially > for many questions at once. Caching, in particular. Yes, I agree with that. Perhaps we could specify that a request for an RRSERIAL MUST only be satisfied for a response with AA=1, so that only servers that are able to provide an authoritative response to the original query will return it. In contrast, I think there are probably use cases for a server that can't provide an authoritative response (e.g. a recursive server) to process a more generic multi-question query. So this seems like a reason to consider the two problem statements separately. I don't know exactly what use cases Petr had in mind for that though, so I'm guessing slightly. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
