I like the document, but the section on validators recommends not to
follow requirements from RFC 5155, so I don't expect that best-practice
track is sufficient. And I do think we need a similar update to 5155,
be it in this document or a separate one.
I'd also expect something on limits accepted by secondaries. And some
details are probably up to further discussion (e.g. particular numbers
and SERVFAIL), but I don't think such details would block adoption.
--Vladimir | knot-resolver.cz
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
