On 12 May 2021, at 17:03, Eric Orth <ericorth=40google....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 4:28 PM Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Responses including partial RRsets are as unlikely (and as illegal) as a >> response to a query for SVCB being a TXT record saying "I'm a teapot". > > Agreed that there is no such issue with either wire format if all parties in > the ecosystem are bug-free and RFC-compliant. Do you know of an example of a DNS authoritative or recursive server that does return truncated RRSets in the ANSWER section? I appreciate the value of scepticism when it comes to these kinds of things, but I have never seen any data to suggest that this happens. So much of the DNS depends on correct behaviour here that I'm dubious that this is a real concern. If it's not a real concern, using it as justification for a particular design decision seems worth questioning. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
