On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 08:59 +0200, Shane Kerr wrote: > And maybe cache the value if desired?
I'm already looking forward to having serials in resolver cache dumps! > At the very least, maybe the draft should be agnostic towards > non-authoritative servers? > > So instead of: > > This EDNS option is aimed only to authorative servers for a zone. > Resolvers and forwarders should ignore the option. It's only > intended for hop-to-hop communication (not transitive). > > Maybe: > > This EDNS option is aimed only at authoritative servers for a zone. > It's only intended for hop-to-hop communication (not transitive). > Resolver and forwarder behavior is undefined. I like this. I suspect defining it well for answers from resolvers to clients would open up a big can of worms that could kill the draft, like many other drafts that have been crushed under the sheer weight of scope creep. Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
