On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 6:33 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2021, at 2:21 PM, Wes Hardaker <wjh...@hardakers.net> wrote: > > > > Peter van Dijk <peter.van.d...@powerdns.com> writes: > > > >> I propose replacing rfc5011-security-considerations > > > > I keep meaning to republish it with Olafur's suggested reduced title > > (since it's really describing just one problem). But it's unlikely to > > get published as an RFC due to lack of consensus after a long drawn out > > conversation where most of the WG stopped reading due to the harsh > > language of some messages. > > For those who don't remember, the lack of consensus was based on too few > people speaking to support the document after one WG member kept harshly > objecting to some of the wording. This happened well WG Last Call was > finished. The chairs decided to kill the document rather than deal > decisively with the one obstructionist WG participant. > > > It can probably be dropped from the active > > list because of this. > > I would like to see the document, which we all already agreed on, moved to > IETF Last Call instead. > > +1 > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
