On 29Jul21, Geoff Huston allegedly wrote: > For me it appears to depend on the actions of the resolver as to whether this > would be faster > or not. If all resolvers blindly re-query using TCP for all UDP responses > where TC=1 is seen in
I'm not sure I follow this bit. Are you merely implying that the resolver should first consider a larger edns0 bufsize before resorting to TCP? Or are you suggesting that responses with TC=1 should include as much of the answers as will fit and then the resolver can decide whether enough is enough? That is, what do they look at to avoid a "blind requery"? Mark. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
