Hi, [Employed by ISOC, speaking for self]
Speaking as usual only for myself, it seems to me that if there were actual demand for a WG that would actually W as a G on actual extensions, it would be pretty trivial to charter it. What would be bad IMO is a “working group” that functioned instead as DNSGATE. But I, of course, don’t have much to contribute one way or the other. Best regards, A — Andrew Sullivan Please excuse my clumbsy thums > On Jul 31, 2021, at 11:48, Ray Bellis <r...@bellis.me.uk> wrote: > > > >> On 30/07/2021 19:29, Paul Wouters wrote: >> >> We are seeing the WG dropping actual protocol work because of these >> discussions. > If only we had a working group for discussing DNS Extensions... > > Ray > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
