On Thu, 5 Aug 2021, Tim Wicinski wrote:
Subject: [DNSOP] Dropping the draft "The DELEGATION_ONLY DNSKEY flag"
This came up in the poll, but also the discussion on priorities. There seems to be strong feelings on dropping this draft. We adopted with the idea that if we could not find WG consensus, we were not going to advance it, and that seems to be the case.
We had several people in favour of the experiment, and Joe Abley against it. May I know how you determined the lack of consensus versus the in "in the rough" ? Especially since in this case, we are talking about something that is completely optional to implement and deploy, so that people who don't like it find zero negative effects from this.
The document is here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-only/ If anyone feels that DNSOP should keep working on this, please speak up.
Note that from a point of view of "work", the biggest issues were ENT, which were addressed based on the ideas of Paul Vixie, and orphan glue, for which simple solutions exist (eg move it to a dedicated zone, eg orphan-glue.tld) I understand some people feel the experiment has no value to them. But should the WG really prevent the experiment? It also comes with an additional risk that there will appear "adhoc solutions" that try to implement the "delegation only" policy based on hardcoded lists, due to the lack of parental signaling for this. Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
