Folks, I was waiting for the last discussion to die down (and then, um, for me to finally examine the opinions). The results are in from the people that weighed in:
| who | wants | accepts | |------------------+-------+----------------------------| | Peter van Dijk | 0 | anything low | | Matthijs Mekking | 150 | 150 -- vendors implemented | | Miek Gieben | 100 | or lower | | Paul Vixie | 0 | | | Vladimír Čunát | any | | | Viktor Dukhovni | 0 | 100 or 150 | I think the consensus is "everyone wants low", but most are willing to accept any value up to 150. The most important sticking point is there are 4 implementations (thank you for the links Matthijs) that have implemented 150. Since DNSOP strives for implementations of specs, I think this is the number we should publish *unless the vendors speak up and say they'll drive lower*. 150 is higher than almost everyone would ideally like, and zero would certainly be a nice target. But without implementation... -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
