On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Likely so, or it can be incorporated into a separate update document, if that's deemed more efficient. With DANE working group no longer around, would "dnsop" be an appropriate home for such work?That would likely be much worse than creating a DNAEbis WG and having the couple of DANE-related documents there.
I agree :) Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
