I sent this earlier today but I failed to do the Reply-All: ---
>From the chairs, This needs to stop. Please send suggested text for the document that can be discussed, otherwise we are requesting you cease Thanks Tim ---- On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:02 AM Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Masataka Ohta wrote: > > >>> I can't see any reason why you think the root zone is > >>> more secure than TLDs, especially because, as I wrote: > >> > >> Because I am informed about their operational procedures and I > >> contributed to the technical design as one of the for the DNS Root Zone > >> Key-Signing-Key of the Root Zone Rollover advisory group. > > > > So, you mean the root zone is secure because of "operational > > procedures", which is not cryptographic. > > No I did not say that at all. > > > Thank you very much to have confirmed my point that DNSSEC > > is not cryptographically secure. > > > Your point is, surely, conclusive. > > This twisting of my words has now reached abusive levels, and I hope > the chairs will now take action. > > Paul >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
