On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 16:45 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: > > On 16 Apr 2022, at 05:24, Blacka, David < > > davidb=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > > RFC 4955
Wrt to the assignment of additional numbers for experiment, RFC 4955 says in Sec. 5: > Alternately, the experiment MAY use the Object Identifier (OID) > private algorithm space instead (using algorithm number 254), or MAY > choose non-private algorithm numbers, although this would require an > IANA allocation. > For reasons laid out in this thread, choosing the later option enhances the experiments (cf. "MAY" RFC 2119) and is thus explicitly allowed. I believe this is what Paul is proposing to do. I support such an assignment. Best, Nils -- deSEC e.V. · Kyffhäuserstr. 5 · 10781 Berlin · Germany Vorstandsvorsitz: Nils Wisiol Registergericht: AG Berlin (Charlottenburg) VR 37525 _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
