Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Francesca's DISCUSS around use of SHOULDs. Thanks for the fixes to IANA Considerations. One minor issue remains, which is that we're allowing an automatically-expiring document (an I-D) to set the bar for what constitutes a valid Format Reference. Given such a registration might be permanent, a disappearing reference seems a curious choice. The discussion in the WG indicates that this is done to support experimental registrations and the like; it might be good for the text to say so. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
