Regarding a presentation format for OPT, note that the EDNS options have essentially the same wire format as SVCB SvcParams, so it may be possible to share the SvcParams parsing logic.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:57 AM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: > On Sep 14, 2022, at 8:54 AM, Petr Špaček <pspa...@isc.org> wrote: > > I agree that full structured JSON is lots of work, and honestly I don't > see the need for it. > > > > From my perspective more useful is to standardize unambiguous > presentation formats for all EDNS options first. Maybe we will find out > that it is enough. Or maybe not, but the presentation formats could be a > corner stone, and are useful by itself. > > +1. As I said yesterday, even a "full structured JSON" cannot be useful to > everyone. Unambiguous presentation formats can be. > > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
