On Oct 20, 2022, at 08:26, Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote: > On 20.10.22 14:14, Jim Reid wrote: >> IMO, it doesn’t say that at all Eliot. A fairer PoV here would be when the >> IETF gets handed non-IETF problems, it keeps well away (perhaps after a >> discussion of the merits and/or scope of that problem). > > As I wrote, we should discuss this in London, but I don't think that is a > fairer point of view. Such a registry would naturally attach to the ALT TLD. > Not doing this means half a job done, and nature abhors a vacuum.
To be clear, Eliot, you're not suggesting that these topics shouldn't be discussed here, right? High-bandwidth face-to-face conversations over beer in the shadow of a collapsing quasi-imperial government are no doubt valuable, but it'd be a shame if anybody not travelling there interpreted comments about London to mean that their opinions aren't welcome. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
