Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Roman's discuss. I would rather see this document be published by the ISE than go through the IETF stream. My specific concern is than an operator who reads this RFC and doesn't know the context may not be aware that this may be an inappropriate algorithm to use. Even if this is published via the ISE channel then I think that it should be stated very clearly early in the document that the cryptographic properties haven't been independently verified. Regards, Rob _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
