On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 00:04, Paul Vixie <paul=40redbarn....@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:
> should be Rdata or RData but never RDATA.
Also it turns out that RFC 8499 is probably not sufficient as a reference since
it doesn't include definitions for most of those RRTypes, or RDATA, or Rdata,
or RData. But I think the general idea might be ok if a reference to 1035 was
stirred in.
Joe
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
