On 12/15/22 15:01, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
On 15/12/2022 14.45, Peter Thomassen wrote:
In what sense is this document "informational" when it is called "validator requirements", or, conversely, in what sense does it spell out "requirements" when it is only "informational" and not "standards track"?
The current *title* says "Recommendations". I don't think the draft name
matters much, especially after it becomes an RFC.
Apologies. I was suffering from the misconception / misreading that the words
from the draft name are also in the title. -- Of course, the name is irrelevant.
Thank you for clarifying, Vladimír!
Best,
Peter
--
https://desec.io/
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
