(chairs hat on)
Paul is correct.
Also, I feel we ("we" being the chairs + Overlord Warren + IESG folks)
should write some nice simple text to explain this
to authors in the future.
tim
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 1:42 PM Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023, zhangcuiling wrote:
>
> > Dear dnsop,
> >
> > According to the comment, I modified the draft. There are two major
> changes.
> >
> > 1. Modify the description of SM3 DS records ( Section 2 )
> > In section 2, the length of digest is listed as a difference between
> SHA-256 and SM3,
> > but in reality the length of both algorithms is 32 bytes. [Corrected]
>
> Note that this document should probably proceed via the Independent
> Stream (ISE), similar to the proposed solution for the GOST document:
>
> See
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis/ballot/#draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis_roman-danyliw
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
