On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 12:19 PM Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > Big fan of this document and feel it is good. I have only one small nit: > > > > See also "domain name" in [RFC8499]. > > > > > > Should this not be "Domain name" (per 8499) ? > > > > I have a deeper question on using "ext" for extension - it feels like an > > abbreviation which doesn't feel useful. But I'm no expert on matters of > > the written word. > > Would you prefer "private" ? As in Private Use ? >
or have the XML spell it out completely? I feel that "Fax" is some baked in requirement and that the only folks left using Fax machines are lawyers, doctors and ICANN. tim > > Paul >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
