All

I was not being passive aggressive about the authors publishing their
update, I was reading the datatracker incorrectly from my phone.

However, since they now have published their update, let us do this WGLC.
 Much has changed, mostly after feedback from previous
IETF meetings that this is changed to a BCP.

As an operator, the chairs would love to hear feedback pro or con on their
views on this.

The WGLC will still end on March 2nd, 2023

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 12:06 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> OH Apologies.
>
> I had felt the authors published their new version, but I sent the wrong
> draft message out.
>
> Please ignore this and I'll stop trying to be useful today
>
> tim
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 12:04 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> All
>>
>> The authors and the chairs feel this document has reached the stage where
>> it's ready for Working Group Last Call.
>>
>>
>> This starts a Working Group Last Call for:
>> draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques
>>
>> Current versions of the draft is available here:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/
>>
>> The Current Intended Status of this document is: Best Current Practice.
>> Initially this docucment started out as Informational and more about a
>> survey, but feedback from the working group moved towards BCP.  If this
>> feels wrong in any way, please speak up!
>>
>> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments.
>> If this does not seem appropriate please speak out.
>> If someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication,
>> please speak out with your reasons.
>>
>> This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on:
>> March 2nd 2023
>>
>> thanks
>> tim
>>
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to