On Mar 7, 2023, at 6:03 PM, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: >>> Perhaps it would be useful for someone to decide whether these ships are >>> intentionally passing in the night or whether more attention to navigation >>> is required. >> >> 1) The leadership of both were well aware of what the other was doing. Note >> that Warren Kumari is both on the IESG and one of the lead developers of >> SAC113. >> >> 2) The two topics are explicitly different: one is for a name that can be >> used in the DNS (SAC113) when the user wants a name that is not in the DNS >> root, the other is for a name that is not to be used in the DNS context >> (alt-tld) when the user wants a name that is not in the DNS root. >> >> 3) Literally the only failure case would be if the name chosen by IANA for >> SAC113 was "alt" because "alt" is not yet in the 6761 registry. That cannot >> happen because IANA is completely aware of the alt-tld draft and has >> followed its progression for years. > > It sounds like you are saying that there is no need for coordination.
No, I ma pushing back against the suggestion that there was insufficient coordination. There was plenty. > Perhaps we are both actually asking the same question about this plan to > engage liaisons and coordinate? There is only one liaison for both directions (Harald Alvestrand). He was named in the message that started this thread. He understands better than anyone how the coordination should happen, and has been aware of this for years. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
