(speaking as a chair)
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 5:22 PM John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Apr 2023, Miek Gieben wrote: > >> I think it's an interesting idea but I also don't want to spend time on > it > >> if it's just going to be filed and forgotten. > > > > I looked into this for https://github.com/miekg/dns > > > > The option is trivial to implemented (in an auth server). I.e. seems > similar > > to NSID. > > I agree that it's not hard to do. But the Camel reminds us that there is > an unlimited number of hacks that would be easy to implement, but not > necessarily that anyone would use. Hence my question about whether > anyone's implemented it. > ' John While you are correct on remembering the camel, the "OP" part of DNSOP stands for "Operations" (DNSOP for the Operators!), I try to judge new work with a another question "does this make it easier for operators to deploy and benefit from?" (now speaking as myself) In this case I do feel this would be useful and will be used by operators. And more so than ZoneMD, because as George point, it's a different class of checks. tim >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
