Hi WG,
Gentle reminder to fill in the doodle to schedule the interim in June.
Will extend the poll until Thursday, June 1!
-- Benno
On 24/05/2023 16:11, Benno Overeinder wrote:
Dear WG,
As mentioned earlier on the mailing list, the chairs are planning an
interim meeting in June to discuss the three options on how to proceed
with draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis wrt. lame delegation:
1) Stick with the current text in the document – the original definition
from RFC8499 plus a note that "These early definitions do not match the
current use of the term "lame delegation", but there is no consensus on
what a lame delegation is."
A possible follow-up to this is for someone to start a WG consensus
document on "lame", which can update 8499bis.
2) We still find a rough consensus on the definition proposed in the
"Meaning of lame delegation" email thread, and the WG can agree that
this is a definition useful to DNS engineers/operators.
3) Withdraw the document from WGLC so we can add definitions. Do not
propose any new terms and definitions at this stage if we choose this
option.
Please fill in the Doodle poll to settle on a day and time:
- https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/az7Z5AOb
The options for the time slots are a compromise for CEST/EDT/PDT/AEST/JST.
We will close the Doodle poll at the end of Tuesday 30 May.
Best regards,
Suzanne, Tim and Benno
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
