Peter On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 3:37 AM Peter van Dijk <peter.van.d...@powerdns.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-07-05 at 18:51 -0400, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > All > > The authors of draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation worked with different > implementers to expand upon the index of Known Implementations, and what > they implement specifically. > > The chairs would like to have a one week follow up Working Group Last Call > comment period. We are looking for substantive comments regarding the > changes made, and if they are enough to address concerns raised. > > > As Vladimir also said in his dnsdir review, this document is in way better > shape than it was. > > I do see one obstacle. > > In section 3.1, the draft says: > > > 2. UDP responders are RECOMMENDED to set IP "Don't Fragment flag (DF) > bit" [RFC0791 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc791>] on IPv4. > > Then in Appendix D (Known Implementations), all implementations have > indicated they do *not* set the DF bit. It seems wrong to RECOMMEND > something, especially in a document targeted for BCP, that nobody is doing. > > This is a good point, and something we need to address. I've made a note in the chairs slides for tomorrow, and will talk to the authors. This comment period will end Wednesday July 12, 2023. If there > are substantive comments raised, we can address these during the meeting. > > A friendly request: please indicate Last Calls in the Subject! I missed > this one until now. > > > Yes and this is my fault. Apologies. I am chastised. Tim Kind regards, > -- > Peter van Dijk > PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
