IMHO, the doc does make changes to two RFCs which are normative, so this LC document should update RFC1035 and RFC 6891. If you agree please mention that in the document.
AB On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 11:17 AM Nicolai Leymann via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Nicolai Leymann > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the designated DNS Directorate reviewer for > draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion. > The draft is well written and defines an EDNS option which can be used for > debugging purposes. > > In general I think the draft is ready for publication. > > Nits: > During the WGLC there were a some discussions on the -02 version of the > document to clarify a few details in wording. I have not seen any update > to the > document and it might be useful to check if those comments need to be > addressed. > > The size of an "unsigned decimal integer" is not defined (see rfc6891). > > It might be useful to extend some of the abbrevation if they are used the > first > time (e.g., meaning of RR, SOA, ... depends on context). > > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-c...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
