1: Please add to the Abstract saying what this changes in RFC2308, and how it obsoletes RFC8499. E.g: "This document updates RFC 2308 by clarifying the definitions of Forwarder and QNAME, and obsoletes RFC 8499 by adding multiple terms and additional clarifications. A comprehensive list can be fond in Appendix A and B."
Strong nit: Abstract: "The terminology used by implementers and developers of DNS protocols, and by operators of DNS systems, has sometimes changed in the decades since the DNS was first defined." — I still (I commented on this when RFC8499 was originally sent to me) really dislike the "has sometimes changed" phrasing. The terminology **has** changed in the decades since the DNS was first defined — individual terms may not have, but "The terminology has … changed in the decades since the DNS was first defined." - this is clearly editorial / a personal opinion (and I'll progress it if the authors *really* want to keep it like this), but I think ti would be much better if it were changed. W
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
