All I know this was a bit longer than a week, but we wanted to receive some confirmations from folks with questions on implementations. We've received that, and the chairs feel the consensus is to move forward.
Thanks tim On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 2:27 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > (forgive my missing subject previously) > > > All > > After pulling this back (Thanks Peter again), we went back to the authors > and > > In the case of the DF bit, the wording is changed from > "UDP responders are RECOMMENDED" to "UDP responders MAY" > > They also added some additional text in the security section. > > The authors relabeled the suggestions using "R1" -> "R12", which > actually was better than my idea. > > The diffs can be found here: > > > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-14&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-15&difftype=--html > > > This will be a one week working group followup last call. > We want to make sure the implementers etc are happy with these changes. > > This Working Group Last Call will end on September 20, 2023 > > thanks > > tim >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
