I was looking at these two drafts. The first one says that scanning for CDS updates is bad, so use NOTIFY(CDS) rather than scanning. The second one says to scan for DS bootstrap. I am experiencing cognitive dissonance.
I suggest adjusting the bootstrap draft saying to send NOTIFY(DS) to the parent of a delegated name to tell it to do the bootstrap rather than scanning. The issues in section 3 about why scanning is bad and in section 4 about where to send the notification are exactly the same as what's there now. I suppose you could overload NOTIFY(CDS) and the parent does one or the other depending on whether the zone already is signed but it seems to me that the operations are different so the notification might as well be different too. Bonus update: if we do this, in the bootstrap draft take out section 4.3 on triggers and instead say to use notify. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
