Paul, On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 12:38:09AM +0100, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Oct 31, 2023, at 19:17, Frederico A C Neves <fne...@registro.br> wrote: > > > > Dear David, > > > > Section 7 of the draft is sufficiently clear, precise, and complete. > > > > This registration at the time it is approved by the IESG, taking in > > account the fact that currently there is no other request for TXT _er > > on the "virtual request queue", is reviewed as OK and approved. > > I agree, although I do wonder what “er” stands for. Error Report? Why not use > “_err” which is more intuitively an error ? >
Because of the additive nature of the spec on cascading/concatenating error situations I would guess that the authors opted for the shortest node name available to fit as much errors as possible. > Paul Fred _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
