Gaaaaah…. Apologies all, autocomplete fail — turns out "dnsop-chairs" starts with "dnsop".
Sorry for the noise, W On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:36 PM, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > Heyya chairs, > > I futzed some more with the demo GH issue tracker I created on the call, > and invited you to the repo: https://github.com/wkumari/ > Temp-DNSOP_Doc_Tracker/issues . I did also play more with github projects > (and some other project / ticket things), but they don't really looks like > they would work well for this…. > > I've only put in a few drafts and labels, but I think that it gives a > flavor of how we might be able to use it to track, and more importantly, > communicate the status of documents. > > Some examples: > Documents waiting on chairs: https://github.com/wkumari/ > Temp-DNSOP_Doc_Tracker/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AChairs > > Documents where we need more WG input: https://github.com/wkumari/ > Temp-DNSOP_Doc_Tracker/ > issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Review+needed%22 > > Things that need actions from me: https://github.com/wkumari/ > Temp-DNSOP_Doc_Tracker/issues/assigned/wkumari (once you've accepted the > GH repo invite we demo assigning things to you). > > A document with some more detail / synthetic info: https://github.com/ > wkumari/Temp-DNSOP_Doc_Tracker/issues/8 > > > Clearly this is just a demo (and it will be much much more useful after > it's been used for a while and so actually has useful information / data), > but I figured it was worth playing with. > > Ideally, once we've had a look (and probably added some more labels, etc.) > we can share it with the WG, and see what they think. People should be able > to subscribe to particular issues, and so get updates when things change, > etc. > I'd also like to look into adding labels for "I'm requesting CfA" or > "Requesting WGLC" that authors/participants can apply - this seems like it > will be easier to track than a request buried in the bottom of an email. > > > I fully agree with Suz it's sucky that we will have the same info in > multiple places (DT, GH, etc) — ideally, after some amount of timing we can > write up good feature requests, and ask the tools team to fold some of > this into the datatracker. Yes, DT does already have the "History" tab for > each draft, but the info there isn't shown on the dashboard, and you cannot > (yet) add tags, etc. > > In the meantime we can probably write some simple automation to copy DT > into into GH issues… > > Thoughts? Does this seem useful? > W >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
