Mahesh Jethanandani has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-qdcount-is-one-03: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-qdcount-is-one/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 3, paragraph 1 > A brief summary of the guidance provided in the existing DNS > specification for the use of QDCOUNT can be found in Appendix A. > While the specification is clear in many cases, in the specific case > of OPCODE = 0 (QUERY) there is some ambiguity which this document > aims to eliminate. By "existing DNS specification" do you mean RFC1035? Please state so. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
