On 4/22/25 13:26, Andrew McConachie wrote:
This is an overly creative interpretation of the Board’s resolution. It
implicitly adds a modifier preceding “delegation” where none exists. The
Board did not resolve to “reserve[s] .INTERNAL from [normal|secure]
delegation”. They resolved to “reserve .INTERNAL from delegation”. The
resolution could not be more clear.
The fact of the matter is that some people want “no delegation” and some
people want “insecure delegation”. That ship has sailed, and we ended up
with “no delegation”. DNSOP can’t change that.
My suggestion for the people in the “insecure delegation” camp is to
petition the SSAC to write a document asking for a different name to be
insecurely delegated. I see the benefits of both camps, so I’m not
advocating for one or the other. But for .internal this really can’t be
changed at this point.
Just to clarify: Are you suggesting ICANN board cannot ever issue
another resolution on this matter?
--
Petr Špaček
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
