Michael StJohns <[email protected]> wrote: > That said, if the NTIA wanted GoDaddy to ghost write a document on their > behalf describing the current model, it might be a useful Informational > contribution via the ISE along the lines of other "here's how we do it" > documents the RFC series has published over the years, but it would be a > GoDaddy and/or NTIA document published by the ISE, and not an IETF document. > I would expect such document to require approval of the NTIA's COTR or > CO.
> Tl;dr - updating this document should not be a work item for DNSOP or any
> other IETF WG. The old document SHOULD be obsoleted because the
management
> of the .US domain is no longer in the hands of the IANA or original NIC
and
> is controlling on no one.
+1 from me. Thanks for saying this.
Or, if/when we mark 1480 as Historic, we would refer to some NTIA
document/contract.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
