I'm happy to make that change, Vittorio. Cheers,
> On 20 Feb 2026, at 1:07 pm, Vittorio Bertola > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Il 20/02/2026 02:31 CET Mark Nottingham <[email protected]> ha >> scritto: >> >> >> Hi Paul, >> >>> On 20 Feb 2026, at 12:16 pm, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Why the draft name change? I thought this looked familiar and then >>> re-found draft-nottingham-public-resolver-errors. The diff between >>> that and this is fairly small: >> >> As discussed in the interim, the old name was no longer applicable, and >> potentially confusing. > > However, the new name reopens the controversy on whether each and every > instance of DNS filtering can be labeled "censorship". In the past, we > reached consensus by having three EDE codes for filtering, of which only one > is labeled "censored"; the draft applies to all three of them. Moreover, the > text of the draft only uses the word "censored" once, in section 6, as one of > two options ("filtered or censored"). For the rest, the text always talks > about "DNS filtering". > > So I really do not understand why now we need to use "censorship" in the > title. I would suggest to call the document "DNS Filtering Transparency" > which IMHO is more general and more appropriate. > > -- > Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange > [email protected] > Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
