Shane Kerr writes: > One thing that I really like about the draft is that it documents > refreshing TTL values for NS on any lookup at the parent. This is > probably something resolver implementers already do, but writing it > down seems useful.
It would seem to obviate 11 versions and over 6 years of work on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation/ Or maybe not. I haven't tried to reconcile them. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
