You don’t have to implement DELEG to validate DELEG records. -- Mark Andrews
> On 24 Jul 2026, at 03:22, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > > It appears that Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> said: >> -=-=-=-=-=- >> >> So, the question is: do we want delext to make it possible to define >> >> new parent-side types that work with NS? > > I'm having no luck coming up with a plausible use case. Any DS2 type will be > newer than DELEG, so any resolver that understands DS2 will presumably also > understand DELEG. > > I'm trying to imagine a reason you'd take a pre-DELEG resolver and hack DS2 > support into it rather adding it to your current DELEG-aware resolver. But > my imagination isn't that good. > > R's, > John > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
