draft-ietf-dnsop-filtering-transparency? I suspect there may still need to be some adjustment of the title, but I think this works for now.
Cheers, > On 30 Jul 2026, at 10:59 pm, Benno Overeinder <[email protected]> wrote: > > All, > > Thank you for your input on the call for adoption of draft > draft-nottingham-dnsop-censorship-transparency. All respondents said yes to > the call for adoption. This email concludes the call for adoption, and the > draft is now adopted as a WG document. > > It has been suggested (twice, if I am correct) that, upon adoption by the > DNSOP WG, the file name should be changed to something like > "dns-filtering-transparency" to reflect the title change. > > Best regards, > > -- Benno > > On 09/07/2026 21:53, Benno Overeinder via Datatracker wrote: >> This message starts a dnsop WG Call for Adoption of: >> draft-nottingham-dnsop-censorship-transparency-01 >> This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-07-23 >> Abstract: >> [I-D.ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error] introduces structured error >> data for DNS responses that have been filtered. This specification >> allows more specific details of filtering incidents to be conveyed. >> Discussion Venues >> This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. >> Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at >> https://github.com/mnot/public-resolver-errors. >> Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption >> of this Internet-Draft by the dnsop WG. Comments to explain your preference >> are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message and >> include this message in your response. >> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual >> Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2]. >> Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions >> of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. >> Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be >> found at [3]. >> Thank you. >> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ >> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ >> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ >> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-dnsop-censorship-transparency/ >> There is also an HTML version available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-dnsop-censorship-transparency-01.html >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-nottingham-dnsop-censorship-transparency-01 >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > -- Mark Nottingham https://mnot.net/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
