> On 24 Aug 2026, at 18:37, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > > It appears that Roy Arends <[email protected]> said: >> That gives us three useful behaviours: >> >> Range 1: include the Delegation Type, omit NS. >> Range 2: include the Delegation Type, retain NS. >> Range 3: do not include the Delegation Type in the referral; return it only >> when explicitly queried. > > How is range 3 different from any random type like TXT?
Random types like TXT can't exist at a delegation point. > Is it just saying that it's OK to have these > at a referral point? Yes. Roy _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
