Wes Hardaker writes: > So if I read that right, then all the code bases need to understand > it order to do the right thing anyway? In which case what is the > benefit of having a separate range, as opposed to just assigning new > RRTYPES anywhere int the tree? Unless the goal is to enable a > and > < operation vs a switch statement for when to do something? Is that > the new purpose?
It's analogous to the generic TYPENNNNN mechanism. It allows a new type to roll out in a way that both authorities and resolvers have a good understanding of where the record is authoritative and how it should be handled w.r.t. the delegation point. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
