On Sun, 06 Sep 2026 09:40:22 +0200, =?utf-8?B?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?= wrote: >The WGLC ends tomorrow, so if you have anything to say, please do so today or >tomorrow. >
Sigh, my mail replying seems to have gotten eaten, so sorry for the late post to this thread. I support publication of this I-D. As someone publishing papers on the academic side of the house, this I-D helps demonstrate the importance of problem and define its scope in a way that I think will be helpful. (Both for those deploying and for those studying DNS integrations.) -John >Ondrej >-- >Ondřej Surý (He/Him) >[email protected] > >A gentle nudge is always appreciated if I take a little longer to reply. > >> On 24. 8. 2026, at 14:52, Ondřej Surý via Datatracker <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> This message starts a WG Last Call for: >> draft-ietf-dnsop-integration-04 >> >> This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-09-07 >> >> Abstract: >> This document describes considerations when integrating a DNS domain >> name into an application environment. Goals of this document include >> minimizing conflicts between the global DNS and applications that >> integrate with the global DNS, providing a consistent user experience >> (unique identifier across environments), and avoiding impacts to the >> security, stability, and resiliency of the global DNS. While all >> sources of potential concern cannot be enumerated in one document, >> accounting for at least the considerations discussed here should >> improve the security posture of both the global DNS and integrating >> applications. >> >> File can be retrieved from: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-integration-04.txt >> >> Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the >> publication of this document by replying to this email keeping [email protected] >> in copy. Objections should be explained and suggestions to resolve them are >> highly appreciated. >> >> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual >> Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1]. >> Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions >> of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. >> Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be >> found at [3]. >> >> Thank you. >> >> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ >> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ >> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-integration/ >> >> There is also an HTML version available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-integration-04.html >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-integration-04 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > >_______________________________________________ >DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] >To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
