On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:53:10 -0800, Mark Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I have recently completed some independent research and analysis in
> > the area of DNS delegation of ccTLDs (county code Top Level Domains).
> > If you would, please take a moment to review the scores and findings.
>
> In your report, you mention ns.eu.net specifically (lame for a
> couple of zones). That server is switched of beginning November.
The byline on the report is the 20th of October 2003, at which point
ns.eu.net was still powered on.
I suspect that you'll find that the servers which are lame for notable
numbers of ccTLDs are also secondarying a lot of ccTLDs, and those are
merely the ccTLDs that don't respond to emails of:
'you still list our server but we can't contact your master
server, can you please fix this?'
--
Bruce Campbell RIPE
Systems/Network Engineer NCC
www.ripe.net - PGP562C8B1B Operations/Security
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
