[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Those few who have been promoting the idea of anycast DNS were found to be
> > wrong in their assumptions. See previous discussion on the subject in the
> > archives.
>
> Yes, please do see previous discussions. Many of us operate anycast
> DNS without problems, and we are aware of the possible problems with
> per-packet load-balancing.
It's also important to differentiate between anycast issues (BGP-based
load balancing, if you like) and site balancing issues (which need to
be done in a connection-consistent way).
Many people mix this (I did, too, in my first design papers).
Elmar.
--
"Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren."
(PLemken, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
--------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
