On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Shane Kerr wrote: > Does anybody on this list have a /48 or /64 delegation? Does anybody also > have a > working reverse DNS setup from their provider? (For me, it's "yes" and "no".) > > I've used IPv6 in a few different environments, and have never seen a working > reverse when stateless auto-configuration is used. Isn't it weird to recommend > people implement a practice that is rare (or non-existent)?
Did you mean a /48 or /64 delegation to a residential broadband user or something like that? Because reverse DNS for v6 is commonplace (AFAICS) for bigger endsites and I'm not sure if you're disputing that. My enterprise has a /48 from a PA block, and also has reverse delegation. At my other job, we always delegate reverse DNS (this includes v6 as well) to the (enterprise/university/etc.) customers. Until the customer has configured the reverse delegation properly, we don't even route their traffic. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
