On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:16:34PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Would it perhaps be better to create a Sphinx backend for an existing > source-to-documentation tool like doxygen? I have no idea how hard or > feasible that would be or if there are better candidate tools. Doxygen just > happens to be one I am grudingly familiar with because the C++ programmers > at work use it. If successful it would have the added benefit of exposing > Sphinx and restructured text outside the Python world.
That would be great, but it wouldn't replace what I am doing. I have taylored in my autogeneration of docs a lot of smart guessing (special cases for my module?) to have a usable and readable doc generated. I hate the docs generated by tools like doxygen. They are just not meant for end users, but for programmers. Two purposes, two tools; fair enough. Gaël _______________________________________________ Doc-SIG maillist - Doc-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig
