Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Apr 14, 2010, at 01:30 AM, Michael Foord wrote: > >> Definite +1 from me on adopting reST in docstrings as a standard. I >> haven't looked at the Epydoc convention for parameters (etc) well enough >> to have an opinion on that. > > The thing I like about them is that the rules are very simple, and once > learned are easy to remember.
Did you look at the NumPy guidelines Ralf posted?: http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/CodingStyleGuidelines Those look very clean to me, and fairly similar to what we already do in the ReST docs. Because epydoc works with tags rather than sections, it looks a lot "noisier" to me when reading the plain text version. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Doc-SIG maillist - Doc-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig
