On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Laura Creighton <l...@openend.se> wrote: > So maybe what we need to do is to explictly state that some implementations > have chosen to represent objects which are equivalent as the exact same > object, but that you should not rely on this behaviour because it is > an implementation detail?
That still seems too complicated. Pointing out that equality does not imply identity, regardless of type, should be sufficient for the purpose of describing "is". -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> "A storm broke loose in my mind." --Albert Einstein _______________________________________________ Doc-SIG maillist - Doc-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig
