On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 05:37:19PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Today, I had a long discussion with Abdulazziz about Plural-Forms > because one Debian file in stage2 uses them for talking about the > number of packages that may be installed. > > Below is the IRC log > > My conclusion is that the appropriate header for Arabic is: > > Plural-Forms: nplurals=4; plural=n%100==1 || n==0 ? 0 : n%100==2 ? 2 : n%100>=3 && > n%100<=10 ? 2 : 3; > > which is supposed to mean than Arabic has 4 plural forms: > > 1st (singular) is used for 0 as well as 1 and 101, 201, etc > 2nd (double) is used for 2 as well as 102, 202 and so on > 3rd (3 to 9) is used for 3 to 9 as well as 103 to 109, 203 to 209, etc > 4th is used for the rest > > Do you think this is correct? Is the Plural-Forms header above > correct regarding to this?
Your line makes 2nd and 3rd cases identical, it should be Plural-Forms: nplurals=4; plural=n%100==1 || n==0 ? 0 : n%100==2 ? 1 : n%100>=3 && n%100<=10 ? 2 : 3; It is also not clear whether first case is right or should be n%100<=1 Denis _______________________________________________ Doc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/doc
