Nadim, We are currently not working on HEAD. We are currently working on 2.16 How do you propose maintaing 2.16 and subsequent 2.16 releases while going after HEAD in the future?
We need versioning. Djihed On 19/07/06, Nadim Shaikli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Djihed Afifi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think our Gnome CVS structure should be adapted to make it easy for > the maintainer/translators to maintain the translations. Currently, > the CVS contains translations for 2.14 directly under gnome. We should > adapt a version friendly structure that maps directly with > http://l10n-status.gnome.org , this way > > gnome/2.14 > gnome/2.16 > etc > gnome/HEAD > > Branching each time Gnome branch their translation project. We should only be working on 'HEAD' and as such we should only have the files that pertain to HEAD on our CVS. I believe Arafat.M followed the same structure (which is now simply dated). In short, there is no need to keep old(er) data once its uploaded to the mothership (ie. Gnome's repositories). So it sounds like we simply need to sync-up to Gnome's HEAD files in earnest. If the decision is made to work on what is beyond HEAD (a future release if such files exist) then those files alone should be uploaded (keep in mind that we are very short-handed and as such I don't think we can afford to work on multiple versions of the same application). Salam. - Nadim __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Doc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/doc
_______________________________________________ Doc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/doc
