On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 12:10 PM Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Jean Weber wrote: > > I agree. Much easier to follow. > > > > BTW, the OOo3 naming convention was for a purpose that is no longer > > relevant: something intended to be automated but never implemented JHW > > > > On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 at 07:40 Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net > > > > wrote: > > > Thanks Jean always wondered what that naming convention was for. > > Regards > Keith > > >> I am thinking that it might be a good idea to rename the OOo3 ODF files. > >> The are all in a format nnnAAvv-ChapterName, IE > 0201WG33-IntroducingWriter. > >> > >> As we started off with AOO41GSn for the chapters, I was thinking > >> following on with that naming sceme for the rest of the quides. > >> > >> Please let me know if you agree with this or not. > >> > >> Regards > >> Keith > >> > >> > > > > > The proposed new naming scheme is certainly better than the old one. > Regards, Francis > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
